<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ASP Experts &#187; dynamic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aspexperts.com/tag/dynamic/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aspexperts.com</link>
	<description>.net programming, mssql, c#, vb.net....</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:06:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dynamic Methods in View Data</title>
		<link>http://www.aspexperts.com/dynamic-methods-in-view-data</link>
		<comments>http://www.aspexperts.com/dynamic-methods-in-view-data#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 22:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASP.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASP.NET MVC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aspnetmvc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c#]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dynamic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[host]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vb.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viewdata]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In ASP.NET MVC 3 Preview 1 , we introduced some syntactic sugar for creating and accessing view data using new dynamic properties. Sugar, it’s not just for breakfast. Within a controller action, the ViewModel property of Controller allows setting and accessing view data via property accessors that are resolved dynamically at runtime. From within a view, the View property provides the same thing ( see the addendum at the bottom of this post for why these property names do not match ). Disclaimer This blog post talks about ASP.NET MVC 3 Preview 1, which is a pre-release version. Specific technical details may change before the final release of MVC 3. This release is designed to elicit feedback on features with enough time to make meaningful changes...(<a href="http://feeds.haacked.com/~r/haacked/~3/l0H-8oPbvAg/dynamic-methods-in-view-data.aspx">read more</a>)<img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7593132" width="1" height="1">]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In ASP.NET MVC 3 Preview 1 , we introduced some syntactic sugar for creating and accessing view data using new dynamic properties. Sugar, it’s not just for breakfast. Within a controller action, the ViewModel property of Controller allows setting and accessing view data via property accessors that are resolved dynamically at runtime. From within a view, the View property provides the same thing ( see the addendum at the bottom of this post for why these property names do not match ). Disclaimer This blog post talks about ASP.NET MVC 3 Preview 1, which is a pre-release version. Specific technical details may change before the final release of MVC 3. This release is designed to elicit feedback on features with enough time to make meaningful changes&#8230;(<a href="http://feeds.haacked.com/~r/haacked/~3/l0H-8oPbvAg/dynamic-methods-in-view-data.aspx">read more</a>)<img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7593132" width="1" height="1"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aspexperts.com/dynamic-methods-in-view-data/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Passing anonymous objects to MVC views and accessing them using dynamic</title>
		<link>http://www.aspexperts.com/passing-anonymous-objects-to-mvc-views-and-accessing-them-using-dynamic</link>
		<comments>http://www.aspexperts.com/passing-anonymous-objects-to-mvc-views-and-accessing-them-using-dynamic#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASP.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MVC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c#]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dynamic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[host]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vb.net]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, I’ll start with a little disclaimer: this post is not about whether using dynamic is better/worse than static typing. Instead, it’s about making it more convenient to use dynamic if you choose to go that route . Clearly, some people dislike dynamic, as you can see in the comments in that post from Phil Haack , and for the most part, all the key arguments for/against have been made. So anyway, let’s proceed… Recently, a few people have experimented with extending their view pages from ViewPage&#60;dynamic&#62;. The idea is to then be able to access model data using the more convenient dynamic syntax. e.g. check out this thread on StackOverflow, as well as Phil’s post I mention above. One limitation that people are hitting is that you can...(<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/davidebb/archive/2009/12/18/passing-anonymous-objects-to-mvc-views-and-accessing-them-using-dynamic.aspx">read more</a>)<img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7284107" width="1" height="1">]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, I’ll start with a little disclaimer: this post is not about whether using dynamic is better/worse than static typing. Instead, it’s about making it more convenient to use dynamic if you choose to go that route . Clearly, some people dislike dynamic, as you can see in the comments in that post from Phil Haack , and for the most part, all the key arguments for/against have been made. So anyway, let’s proceed… Recently, a few people have experimented with extending their view pages from ViewPage&lt;dynamic&gt;. The idea is to then be able to access model data using the more convenient dynamic syntax. e.g. check out this thread on StackOverflow, as well as Phil’s post I mention above. One limitation that people are hitting is that you can&#8230;(<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/davidebb/archive/2009/12/18/passing-anonymous-objects-to-mvc-views-and-accessing-them-using-dynamic.aspx">read more</a>)<img src="http://weblogs.asp.net/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7284107" width="1" height="1"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aspexperts.com/passing-anonymous-objects-to-mvc-views-and-accessing-them-using-dynamic/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

